Systems Engineering is a poorly-named field -- it's not so much an engineering discipline as a structured process for producing a design. Just as we can design a homestead , we can apply the Systems Engineering process to develop lasting documents.
The experiment I propose is this: can we apply the elements of the Systems Engineering process to create a constitution that ensures a sustainable and open community?
For this project, I’m speaking only of a governance document for a small community of 100 – 1000 people. The key steps in this process, I believe, are: 1) Identify assumptions; 2) Define the core values (acceptance criteria) for the community; 3) Define secondary goals and objectives; 4) Develop requirements; 5) Make the language readable and clear (i.e. we don’t want it to read like an outline); 6) Perform test cases – examine all the different ways the document can be interpreted; 7) Repeat 1- 6 as needed until document is refined.
I contend that a good constitution is nothing more (or less) than a requirements document: A framework of necessary criteria, but not design solutions (specific laws). If we can keep in mind that we’re not, for instance, specifying the punishment for theft but identifying how that punishment should be decided, we have a good chance of success.
The core values are those key principles that, if nothing else is enforced or remembered, define the nature of the community. They are the concepts that every citizen should hold dear and is constantly working towards.
The core values should also be very limited in number. Try coming up with a list of core values for the United States, then compare that list with any other American – what are the chances that they would be the same? What are the chances that you would even have the same number of values listed? Perhaps your list would include freedom of religion, equal rights to all, the right to bear arms, freedom of speech, the right to vote, and separation of powers. Or do we also include the rights of the states to make their own laws, or avoidance of providing aid and comfort to our enemies, or the right to a jury trial? It’s no wonder we have such division in this country, we can’t even identify the values we should hold most important!
Please don’t misunderstand me -- all of these items are important, but they give us no guidance on our country’s core values. The core values should be easily identifiable, easily remembered, and constantly reiterated to every citizen. Any community member asked should be able to rattle off the core values and explain why each of them is important and believe it. This is the most challenging part of finding the core values: finding ideals worth believing in.
What should the core values be for a sustainable community? For argument’s sake, I propose the following: Sustainability, Cooperation, Freedom of Thought, Respect for Nature, Thirst for Knowledge, and Self-Sufficiency. The meaning for each of these I explain in detail below:
Sustainability: As no system which extracts more from its environment than it replaces can continue functioning indefinitely, so shall the community strive to improve the condition of the planet on which it depends.
Cooperation: As each person depends on the success of their neighbors, so shall all members of the community assist one another when able.
Freedom of Thought: As sharing ideas, expressing thoughts, and communicating knowledge are critical for a free and open society, so shall the community encourage open exchange of thought.
Respect for Nature: As every person is dependent upon a healthy environment, so shall every person treat the natural world with respect.
Thirst for Knowledge: As growth in knowledge and understanding enables a society to remain healthy and vibrant, so shall the community encourage learning and endeavors of exploration.
Self-Sufficiency: As excessive dependence on external groups can put the viability of the community at risk, so shall the community attempt to produce enough resources for every community member.
Do these make sense for a small community? Are there others we should include, or should some of these be deleted? Please share your thoughts and stay tuned for the next part of this project where we refine these core values and work on developing the “goals and objectives” for the constitution.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Magnoliacom
Furl
Constitution
No constitution is ironclad, it is the people that matters. Look at ours (US). The living document sickness allows it to be bent. People "know better", and ignore the limitations of power that it places on Government.
True
No constitution is fascism-proof, but I propose that there is a reduced chance of corruption if a citizenry has a cohesive understanding of what the core principles should be. It's perhaps an exercise in group psychology, trying to instill an understanding of the most important aspects of a free and sustainable society.
PM
You've been taking project management classes, haven't you!?
Ahhhh.
Respect for Neighbors
Noise-levels, driving (hee hee, maybe not for long) speeds, air pollution (ie smoke, whether cigarette or otherwise).
Sorry just ranting a litle, but I do believe that people in this day and age have very little respect for how their actions impact their neighbors. If people are going to live in harmony, this is very important to address. No one should ever speed (if you sit down and work the physics you know you won't get there faster at all and you are just risking lives), and pre-arranged times should be set for when people can be loud or pollute the air (not that this should ever be done unnecessarily).
Rant over.
Constitution
I would cut this list down to self-sufficiency, because it is measurable, but the others are subjective enough to lead to diverse interpretations, and I think the others can be derived from self-sufficiency. For instance, cooperation is a necessary tactic for the goal of self-sufficiency. Without cooperation there is either slavery, which is farther from self-sufficiency than trade, or there is self-insuffiency, as noone can depend on themselves alone
By advocating self-sufficiency, I'm advocating it all around, in that that the community both works at making itself self-sufficient and also works at increasing each individuals' self-sufficiency. Help each other to not need each other, so we can get closer to association based purely on liking each other. Freedom is what attraction self-sufficiency holds for me, and love is the attraction cooperation holds for me
Multiple core values
Self-sufficiency is important, but without the other principles to complement it, we easily head back into the same situation we're currently in. For instance, without advocating sustainability as a value, a community could be self-sufficient by pumping their own oil (if they had it) or by burning down their forests to run their machinery.
OK on that
To maximize self-sufficiency, the period of time of self-sufficiency needs to be maximized, so I take sustainability as inherent in self-sufficiency, but for clarity I agree now it should be added
I haven't exactly figured out the specific reasons I have for desiring self-sufficiency and sustainability, but those reasons are what I'd make the constitution